Main
Discussion board
Contact info
Old homework
Info sheet
Portfolio
Writing tips
PDF files

(For a PDF version of this document, click here.)

Math 424 B portfolio

On December 3, you will turn in a portfolio of solutions for the exercises from this course. This will include three types of problems: exercises we discuss in class, weekly homework problems, and your designated portfolio problems. For the first two types, you will get credit (5%) for having a legible attempted solution. For the portfolio problems, you will choose 6 problems during the quarter to focus on: at least two taken from Chapters 1-2, at least two from Chapters 3-4. On October 19, you will turn in a first draft for two of these solutions, and on October 22 we will have a workshop day, in which we discuss these. Another three drafts will be due on November 19, and we will have a workshop day on November 21. For these portfolio problems, you will get credit for turning in your drafts on time, for participating in the workshop days (5% combined for drafts and workshops), for the mathematical correctness of the solutions (5%), and also for the writing quality (5%).
In the best of all possible worlds, your solutions would be typed up on a computer rather than by hand, but I'm not requiring this. If you want to do it on a computer, a program called LATEX is the best thing around for doing mathematics.
                                                            
Grading criteria.   I will award points from 1 to 5 for two criteria: mathematical correctness, and quality of writing. Your math and writing grades on the portfolio will correspond to your scores.

   1. Mathematical correctness.   Is your solution essentially correct? Does it have any mistakes; if so, how many, and how crucial are they? Have you proved everything that was asked? Did you in fact prove a generalization of what was asked? Are there any serious logical flaws? Have you "proved" something false? Did you use relevant techniques? Did you use all of the hypotheses?
Here is what the numbers represent, roughly, for this category:
  1. Most of your proofs contain serious logical flaws, and so are wrong, or purport to prove something false.
  2. Many of your proofs contain serious logical flaws, or do not prove everything that was asked.
  3. There are a number of small-to-medium mistakes, or a just a few major ones, or some mix of these. Your logic is occasionally shaky, but more or less correct. You have used material or techniques from the appropriate section of the book. You have used all of the hypotheses, or explained why you didn't.
  4. There are no major flaws, but there are some (easily correctable) mistakes.
  5. There are only a few easily correctable mistakes. You may even have proved a more general result.

   2. Quality of writing.   There are "local" and "global" writing issues. Local ones: Have you chosen good notation? Are you using (mathematical) language well and appropriately? Is everything you've written relevant? Have you included a good level of detail? Do you have good transitions? Are there grammatical errors or misspellings? Does your solution sound good when read aloud?
Global writing issues: Have you broken the proof into ideas and paragraphs well? Have you recognized and separated out lemmas and intermediate results? Did you make an appropriate choice of method of proof?
Here is what the numbers represent for this category:
  1. You have only provided pseudo-random strings of symbols on the page. It's not clear what's being proved in which part of your solutions.
  2. You have some garbled mathematical language (for example, you say that a sequence of numbers is continuous). There is some extraneous material. You prove the same thing several times.
  3. Most of the time, you have chosen an appropriate method of proof, and have good notation. You have enough detail. You have mathematically sensible sentences. You have targeted the right audience: your classmates. For the most part, you have used good grammar without misspellings.
  4. Your solutions are well-organized. There is no extraneous stuff. You don't have too much detail. You have good transitions. Your solutions sound good when read aloud. There are very few grammatical errors or misspellings.
  5. There are almost no errors. You have recognized lemmas where appropriate. Your best solutions are elegant and to the point: terse, but not overly so; they are good enough to be publishable in a solutions manual for this course.


File translated from TEX by TTH, version 3.70.
On 24 Sep 2007, 12:50.