Suppose that F and G are isometries of the plane and that ABC is a triangle.
If, F(A) = G(A) = A', F(B) = G(B) = B' and F(C) = G(C) = C', then for all points P, F(P) = G(P). In other words, F = G.
Suppose there is a point P so that F(P) = P1 and G(P) = P2 but P1 is not equal to P2.
Then
This is a contradiction to the assumption that P1 is not P2. Putting all 3 results together means all 3 points A', B', C' are on the perpendicular bisector of P1P2.
In particular, A', B', C' are collinear. But we assumed at the outset that ABC was a triangle. By SSS, then A'B'C' is a congruent triangle and the points cannot be collinear.
This is a contradiction. The only way out of the contradiction is to conclude is we cannot choose a point P so that P1 is not equal to P2. So F(P) = G(P) for all p.
Another way to say the same thing: Given 3 points A, B, C. Denote the distances between points by a = |BC|, b = |CA|, c = |AB|. Since F and G are isometries, also a = |B'C'|, b = |C'A'|, c = |A'B'|. One of the 3 distances is greater than or equal to each of the others. Assume this longest side is c. If A, B, C form a triangle, a + b > c by the triangle inequality. If A, B, C are collinear, then a + b = c by addition of segments on a line. So we started with a triangle ABC satisfying the inequality and ended up with the equality, which is a contradiction.